{"id":26690,"date":"2025-11-20T16:06:12","date_gmt":"2025-11-20T16:06:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/2025\/11\/20\/house-votes-to-repeal-controversial-arctic-frost-provision-from-government-shutdown-bill\/"},"modified":"2025-11-20T16:06:12","modified_gmt":"2025-11-20T16:06:12","slug":"house-votes-to-repeal-controversial-arctic-frost-provision-from-government-shutdown-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/2025\/11\/20\/house-votes-to-repeal-controversial-arctic-frost-provision-from-government-shutdown-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"House votes to repeal controversial Arctic Frost provision from government shutdown bill"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"speakable\">The House of Representatives unanimously voted against a provision that allows Republican senators whose phone records were seized by former Special Counsel Jack Smith to sue the federal government.<\/p>\n<p class=\"speakable\">The provision was included in the recently passed bill to end the 43-day government shutdown, which President Donald Trump signed into law last week.<\/p>\n<p>Despite supporters saying the provision is necessary to give senators recourse when the executive branch oversteps its constitutional bounds and reaches into congressional communications, the last-minute inclusion of the measure outraged both Republicans and Democrats, underscoring the ever-present tensions between the House and Senate.<\/p>\n<p>The repeal passed 426 to 0, with 210 Democrats and 216 Republicans in the tally.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Dubbed &#8216;Requiring Senate Notification for Senate Data,&#8217; the provision would allow senators directly targeted in former special counsel Jack Smith\u2019s Arctic Frost investigation to sue the U.S. government for up to $500,000.<\/p>\n<p>House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., who was involved in crafting part of the successful funding deal, told Fox News Digital he had even been afraid it could derail the final vote to end the shutdown.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;It had been added in the Senate without our knowledge,&#8217; Cole said. &#8216;It was a real trust factor \u2026 I mean, all of a sudden, this pops up in the bill, and we&#8217;re confronted with either: leave this in here, or we pull it out, we have to go to conference, and the government doesn&#8217;t get reopened.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>It was placed into the bill by Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and given the green light by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., sources confirmed to Fox News Digital last week.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Thune put the provision into the bill at the request of members of the Senate GOP, a source familiar with the negotiations told Fox News Digital, which included Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It was a big point of contention <u>when the House Rules Committee<\/u> met to prepare the legislation for a final vote last Tuesday night. Reps. Chip Roy, R-Texas, Austin Scott, R-Ga., and Morgan Griffith, R-Va., all shared House Democrats\u2019 frustration with the measure, but they made clear it would not stand in the way of ending what had become the longest shutdown in history.<\/p>\n<p>Even Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., appeared blindsided by the move.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;I had no prior notice of it at all,&#8217; Johnson told reporters last week. &#8216;I was frustrated, as my colleagues are over here, and I thought it was untimely and inappropriate. So we&#8217;ll be requesting, strongly urging, our Senate colleagues to repeal that.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Those Republicans agreed with the motivations behind their Senate counterparts wanting to sue but bristled over the notion that it would come at the expense of U.S. taxpayers.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. John Rose, R-Tenn., told Fox News Digital the senators &#8216;have been wronged, no doubt in my mind&#8217; but added its scope was too narrow.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;This provision does not allow other Americans to pursue a remedy. It does not even allow the President of the United States, who was equally wrongfully surveilled and pursued by the Justice Department \u2014 they didn&#8217;t even include President Trump in this,&#8217; Rose said.<\/p>\n<p>And while several senators who would be eligible for the taxpayer-funded lawsuits have distanced themselves from the issue amid uproar, others have stuck to their guns.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;My phone records were seized. I\u2019m not going to put up with this crap. I\u2019m going to sue,&#8217; Graham said on &#8216;Hannity&#8217; Tuesday night. He said he would be seeking &#8216;tens of millions of dollars.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Cruz also told Fox News Digital that he did not support repealing the provision.<\/p>\n<p>And Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-Neb., defended the provision in comments to Politico.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;I\u2019d like for us to be able to defend our branch when DOJ gets out of control,&#8217; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., similarly suggested to reporters on Wednesday that he was in favor of the measure.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;I would just say, I mean, you have an independent, co-equal branch of government whose members were, through illegal means, having their phone records acquired \u2014 spied on, if you will, through a weaponized Biden Justice Department,&#8217; Thune said. &#8216;That, to me, demands some accountability.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>He added, &#8216;I think that in the end, this is something that all members of Congress, both House and Senate, are probably going to want as a protection, and we were thinking about the institution of the Senate and individual senators going into the future.&#8217;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on FOX NEWS<\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The House of Representatives unanimously voted against a provision that allows Republican senators whose phone records&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":26691,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26690","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26690","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26690"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26690\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stocksflux.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}